Technological unemployment 3 is not a new problem, but the premise of the economic AI-pocalypse is that this time it’s different. This version of the AI-pocalypse refers to the simple fact that AI has already displaced many human workers and is projected to do so at an increasing rate. The economic AI-pocalypse is worth more consideration than your average AI doomsday scenario. Universal Basic Income as a Proposed Solution to the AI-pocalypse Part 1: The Allure of Universal Basic Income I myself was enthralled with the story at first, but more recently I’ve come to believe it may end in tragedy. They started a forbidden romance that has since enthralled even the most serious tech industry leaders. The impending obsolescence of humanity locked eyes across the room with a utopian vision of all-powerful AI that sees to all our needs. In this piece I’ll be talking about two particular bits of rhetoric that have found an apparently unlikely partnership in the past five years. Scott Santens, Editor, BIT.Īlan Turing created the Turing Test in 1950, 1 Marvin Minsky wrote the first neural network in 1951, 2 and arguments about whether AI will destroy us all or lead to technological utopia have been around ever since. Though I don’t agree with her fears that UBI could end up doing more harm than good within the existing system as is, this essay is loaded with very important information I think everyone needs to understand about the details of automation technologies like AI, and the all important value of the human data that feeds it, and thFe invisible “ghost labor” going on behind it all. In this very lengthy and incredibly thought-provoking think-piece, Vi Hart, former researcher at YC Research and current researcher at Microsoft’s Office of the CTO, dives deep into why she changed her thinking about UBI and about automation itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |